In Super Bowl XLIX, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll made one of the most controversial calls in football history: With 26 seconds remaining, and trailing by four at the Patriots' one-yard line, he called for a pass instead of a hand off to his star running back. The pass was intercepted and the Seahawks lost. Critics called it the dumbest play in history. But was the call really that bad? Or did Carroll actually make a great move that was ruined by bad luck?
Even the best decision doesn't yield the best outcome every time. There's always an element of luck that you can't control, and there is always information that is hidden from view. So the key to long-term success (and avoiding worrying yourself to death) is to think in bets: How sure am I? What are the possible ways things could turn out? What decision has the highest odds of success? Did I land in the unlucky 10% on the strategy that works 90% of the time? Or is my success attributable to dumb luck rather than great decision making?
Annie Duke, a former World Series of Poker champion turned business consultant, draws on examples from business, sports, politics, and (of course) poker to share tools anyone can use to embrace uncertainty and make better decisions. For most people, it's difficult to say "I'm not sure" in a world that values and, even, rewards the appearance of certainty. But professional poker players are comfortable with the fact that great decisions don't always lead to great outcomes and bad decisions don't always lead to bad outcomes.
By shifting your thinking from a need for certainty to a goal of accurately assessing what you know and what you don't, you'll be less vulnerable to reactive emotions, knee-jerk biases, and destructive habits in your decision making. You'll become more confident, calm, compassionate and successful in the long run.
1、追日是作者栎年创作的原创作品,下载链接均为网友上传的的网盘链接!
2、相识电子书提供优质免费的txt、pdf等下载链接,所有电子书均为完整版!
-
抽抽经会被虐的评论冗长和过多例子堆砌,实则干货特别少。只要是接触过cognitive science和decision making的,对书中概念应该非常熟悉。书中唯一有点建设性意见的是寻找truthseeking group。以及不断提醒自己,少点偏见。
-
Sunny的评论作者主要的观点就是:不要对过去做出的选择有所遗憾,因为糟糕的结果,需要不断地前行。里面用到了很多Thinking Fast and Slow里的心理概念。
-
t.的评论口水话比例高;如果熟悉近代大脑/心理学原理和例子,没有什么新信息;关于扑克方便的信息和总结也很少。
-
逆铭睡眼惺忪地的评论道理咱都懂,但鸽子还是很大… 其实不少论点在其他地方都见过,尤其很多都在《思考,快与慢》中提及过。个人觉得可能比较独特有趣的两点:1. 简单地问一句“打个赌?”往往就能迫使自己更理性地分析各种可能性,帮助形成更全面的观点。2. 许多不利于探寻真理的思维定式,如自以为是、怨天尤人、幸灾乐祸,因为它们都会让自我感觉相对更良好,所以都难以改正;因此需要对应地在大脑中为相反想法建立正向反馈,比如夸奖自己“这种情况下我能不怨天尤人真难得”之类的,才能让有益的思维模式形成习惯。
-
daniel yu的评论这不是一本教你怎么打扑克 的书。近年以来,杜克从职业 扑克圈淡出,转型给 CEO 之 类的大人物做演讲和培训,她 教的是科学决策。这也是这本书的内容。
-
Lita的评论觉得很有意思,作者经历也是传奇。
-
AlexanderG的评论audible 已读, 虽然没有特别多可执行的建议,但是对整理思路还是有好处的
-
Cong的评论跟着万老师读书第一本。本来想着一个星期就读完的,无奈兴趣太多,期间还看了三本小说。不过总算今天看完了,花了三个星期。鼓励下自己,继续加油。
-
heizi的评论思想资源上溯到密尔的《论自由》,也综合了近年来行为经济学的研究成果。因为不确定,因为能力和运气交织影响结果,所以得用打牌下赌注的概率思维来考虑如何决策。既要从积极的结果倒推需要采取的步骤,也要预见到光明前途中的困难,做好应对准备。感觉跟中国谚语中的一些人生智慧不谋而合。
-
ven01XX的评论#得到# 打扑克和下象棋是两码事。象棋,所有的信息都摆在台面上,你一看就知道当前是什么形势。而扑克,桌面上亮出来的牌是不全面的,你得猜测对手手里有什么牌,具有很大的不确定性。更重要的是,扑克比赛的结果很大程度上受运气影响:水平低,牌好也能赢;水平再高,牌不好也得输。